Scielo RSS <![CDATA[Espacio Abierto. Cuaderno Venezolano de Sociología]]> http://hml-ve.scielo.org/rss.php?pid=1315-000620260003&lang=es vol. 35 num. 3 lang. es <![CDATA[SciELO Logo]]> http://hml-ve.scielo.org/img/en/fbpelogp.gif http://hml-ve.scielo.org <![CDATA[Conflictos Híbridos: Los medios digitales como instrumentos de manipoulación. ¿Cómo ha sido en Ucrania?]]> http://hml-ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1315-00062026000300009&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es Abstract In hybrid wars, digital media have become a powerful political manipulator of consciousness, so a deep understanding of the mechanisms of such manipulation is a key task in finding ways to counteract it. The purpose of the article is to identify, classify and quantify the main manipulative techniques used in digital media in the context of a hybrid conflict (on the example of the Russian-Ukrainian war), as well as to assess the specifics of their use by various social networks. To that end, a content analysis of 2024 posts from the Facebook, X (Twitter), and TikTok platforms was conducted, categorizing the samples into pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian sources. The results revealed a profound asymmetry: manipulative techniques were more widespread in pro-Russian sources, in particular dehumanization of the enemy, conspiracy theories and visual misinformation. TikTok was the most manipulative, with visual manipulation as the main tool of influence. It turned out that there is a stable negative correlation between trust in the source of information and the amount of manipulation. The results of the study confirm the systemic nature of the information operation and point to the need for a comprehensive response based on media literacy, support for independent media, international cooperation, and accountability of digital platforms.<hr/>Resumen En las guerras híbridas, los medios digitales se han convertido en un poderoso instrumento de manipulación política de la conciencia, por lo que comprender en profundidad los mecanismos de dicha manipulación es fundamental para encontrar formas de contrarrestarla. El objetivo del artículo es identificar, clasificar y cuantificar las principales técnicas de manipulación utilizadas en los medios digitales en el contexto de un conflicto híbrido (tomando como ejemplo la guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania), así como evaluar las particularidades de su uso en diversas redes sociales. Con ese fin, se llevó a cabo un análisis de contenido de 2024 publicaciones de las plataformas Facebook, X (Twitter) y TikTok, clasificando las muestras en fuentes prorrusas y proucranianas. Los resultados revelaron una profunda asimetría: las técnicas manipuladoras estaban más extendidas en las fuentes prorrusas, en particular la deshumanización del enemigo, las teorías de la conspiración y la desinformación visual. TikTok fue la plataforma más manipuladora, utilizando la manipulación visual como principal herramienta de influencia. Se constató que existe una correlación negativa estable entre la confianza en la fuente de información y el grado de manipulación. Los resultados del estudio confirman el carácter sistémico de la operación de información y apuntan a la necesidad de una respuesta integral basada en la alfabetización mediática, el apoyo a los medios independientes, la cooperación internacional y la rendición de cuentas de las plataformas digitales. <![CDATA[Laboratorio de conflictos híbridos del siglo XXI: Venezuela]]> http://hml-ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1315-00062026000300025&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es Resumen Como sucedió en otros contextos, en Venezuela el inicio de un proceso cambios desatado tras la llegada al poder de Hugo Chávez en 1999 provocó todo tipo de respuestas y ataques por parte de los centros hegemónicos mundiales. Las formas de ataque a la llamada Revolución Bolivariana han sido constantes a lo largo de más de veinte años y, dada su pluralidad, podrían enmarcarse bajo el para guas de la guerra híbrida, un concepto que ha tomado fuerza en los últimos tiempos para caracterizar la manera en que se desarrollan los conflictos en el siglo XXI. En este artículo se caracterizará esta nueva (o no tan nueva) modalidad de conflicto aplicada para el cambio de régimen en Venezuela, detallándose algunos ejemplos de cómo se ha utilizado para desplegar un cerco de amplio espectro hacia este país que, en los últimos años, se fue estrechando bajo el Gobierno de Nicolás Maduro.<hr/>Abstract As in other contexts, in Venezuela the beginning of a process of change unleashed after Hugo Chávez came to power in 1999 provoked all kinds of responses and attacks from global hegemonic centers. The forms of attack against the so-called Bolivarian Revolution have been constant for over twenty years and, given their plurality, could be framed under the umbrella of hybrid warfare, a concept that has gained traction in recent times to characterize how conflicts unfold in the 21st century. This article will characterize this new (or not so new) modality of conflict applied to regime change in Venezuela, detailing some examples of how it has been used to deploy a broad-spectrum encirclement of this country, which, in recent years, has tightened under the government of Nicolás Maduro.As happened before with the Cuban Revolution, the beginning of a revolutionary process in Venezuela, unleashed after Hugo Chávez came to power in 1999, pro-voked all kinds of responses and attacks by the world’s hegemonic centers. The forms of attack on the Bolivarian Revolution have been constant throughout these more than twenty years and, given their plurality, they could be framed under the con cept of hybrid warfare. It has gained strength in recent years to characterize the way in which conflicts develop in the XXI century. This chapter will characterize this new (or not so new) modality of war applied for regime change in Venezuela, detailing some examples of how it has been used to deploy a broad spectrum fence to this country Maduro. <![CDATA[Crisis en Líbano y enseñanza a distancia. La percepción estudiantil]]> http://hml-ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1315-00062026000300038&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es Abstract This article explores the relationship between students’ perception of the teaching style and their evaluation of the academic year among Lebanese students, assessing the effectiveness of distance learning during two major crises: the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the September 2024 war. Data collected from 400 students reveal that in-person teaching remains largely preferred, but the impact of teaching methods on student satisfaction varies: it is significant during the pandemic (with interactivity acting as a compensatory factor) and not significant during the war (where the emotional context outweighs the method). These findings highlight the need to integrate targeted psychosocial support into educational policies during crisis periods, and to differentiate support strategies according to the nature of the crisis.<hr/>Resumen Este artículo explora la relación entre la percepción de los estudiantes sobre el estilo de enseñanza y su evaluación del año académico entre estudiantes libaneses, evaluando la efectividad del aprendizaje a distancia durante dos crisis mayores: la pandemia de COVID-19 en 2020 y la guerra de septiembre de 2024. Los datos recolectados de 400 estudiantes revelan que la enseñanza presencial sigue siendo ampliamente preferida; sin embargo, el impacto de los métodos de enseñanza en la satisfacción estudiantil varía: es significativo durante la pandemia (donde la interactividad actuó como un factor compensatorio) y no es significativo durante la guerra (donde el contexto emocional prevalece sobre el método). Estos hallazgos destacan la necesidad de integrar un apoyo psicosocial específico en las políticas educativas durante periodos de crisis y de diferenciar las estrategias de apoyo según la naturaleza de la crisis. <![CDATA[Los cuidados en territorios periféricos: el conjunto urbano <em>El Nido</em>, Zumpango, México]]> http://hml-ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1315-00062026000300065&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es Resumen El artículo examina la relación entre territorio y cuidados en un contexto de expansión urbana periférica, con el propósito de analizar cómo la configuración del espacio urbano y la limitada oferta de servicios de cuidado inciden en la organización cotidiana de estas actividades. El estudio se sitúa en el municipio de Zumpango, Estado de México, y se enfoca particularmente en el conjunto urbano El Nido, localizado en el borde urbano municipal, seleccionado como caso de estudio para analizar las dinámicas de cuidado en un contexto de expansión urbana periférica. Desde una perspectiva territorial, el cuidado se concibe como una práctica social situada, producida en la interacción entre las estructuras urbanas, los arreglos institucionales y las dinámicas de la vida cotidiana. En términos metodológicos, la investigación se desarrolla a partir de un estudio de caso que articula análisis territorial, revisión de fuentes secundarias y trabajo de campo cualitativo, con el objetivo de reconstruir las condiciones de acceso a servicios y las redes de apoyo vinculadas al cuidado. Los hallazgos evidencian que la localización periférica del conjunto, la insuficiente dotación de equipamiento y la fragmentación de los servicios refuerzan la centralidad de la familia como principal proveedora de cuidados y profundizan las desigualdades de género, al concentrar estas responsabilidades en las mujeres. En este contexto, las redes vecinales adquieren relevancia como mecanismos de apoyo, aunque su alcance resulta limitado y desigual frente a las carencias institucionales. A partir de estos resultados, se subraya la necesidad de incorporar la dimensión del cuidado en la planeación urbana y metropolitana como un eje para la reducción de las desigualdades socioespaciales.<hr/>Abstract This article examines the relationship between territory and care practices within the context of peripheral urban expansion, seeking to understand how the spatial configuration of urban environments and the limited provision of care services shape the everyday organization of care practices. The study focuses on the municipality of Zumpango, in the State of Mexico, and takes the El Nido housing complex, located at the municipal urban fringe, as a case study to explore care dynamics in a setting characterized by rapid peripheral urban growth. Adopting a territorial perspective, care practice is conceptualized as a situated social practice emerging from the interaction between urban structures, institutional arrangements, and the routines of everyday life. Methodologically, the research employs a case-study design that integrates territorial analysis, the review of secondary sources, and qualitative fieldwork in order to reconstruct patterns of access to services and the support networks associated with caregiving. The findings reveal that the peripheral location of the housing complex, the limited provision of urban infrastructure, and the fragmentation of care-related services reinforce the centrality of the family as the primary provider of care practices. These conditions simultaneously exacerbate gender inequalities by disproportionately concentrating caregiving responsibilities on women. In this context, neighborhood-based networks emerge as significant, albeit uneven and limited, mechanisms of support in response to institutional shortcomings. The article argues that incorporating the care dimension into urban and metropolitan planning is essential for addressing and mitigating socio-spatial inequalities in rapidly expanding peripheral territories. <![CDATA[Actitud estudiantil ante la diversidad. Su relación con la inclusión educativa en universidades latinoamericanas]]> http://hml-ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1315-00062026000300086&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es Resumen La existencia de la diversidad cultural en América Latina es un hecho incontrovertible, sin embargo, sus niveles de reconocimiento, aceptación y sus efectos en la educación, a pesar de las insistentes advertencias de discriminación social y epistemológica de los organismos internacionales, han sido poco medidos en el ángulo de las políticas públicas concretas. El objetivo de la investigación es medir la actitud de los estudiantes hacia la diversidad y la inclusión en centros de Educación Superior (ES) en cinco países latinoamericanos con indicadas diferencias culturales (Ecuador, Colombia, México, Argentina y Cuba) en relación a sus políticas educativas universitarias específicas. Se aplica una escala actitudinal de Lickert hacia sentencias semánticas ambiguas (no controladas por un marco discursivo previsiblemente aceptable). La muestra estuvo integrada por 2275 estudiantes, mediante selección aleatoria, repartidos con cierta equitatividad por rango de sexo y de países. Estadísticamente, se usó frecuencia simple comparada por grupos y coeficiente de correlación de Spearman para observar la coherencia interna de los conceptos. Los resultados señalan que a diferencia de lo establecido por los organismos internacionales, el resultado presenta una actitud establemente positiva tanto a la diversidad como a la inclusión. Se muestra que los estudiantes son un factor preponderante en la construcción de entornos inclusivos, siendo el poder predictivo de esta relación considerable. Los resultados también indican que las variables socio-demográficas mostraron correlaciones notablemente débiles con la percepción de inclusión. A la luz de los resultados, se reflexiona acerca del discurso de los organismos internacionales a propósito de la inercia cultural discriminatoria en la materia, y se presume: a) inexistencia de suficientes fuentes para repensar y actualizar los verdaderos niveles de discriminación y su inercia simbólica, b) la existencia de un fuerte desfase entre el discurso actitudinal y la realidad de las políticas, lo cual requeriría de estudios de “traducción de políticas”, c) aspectos ajenos a la actitud inclusiva de la sociedad receptora y normativa, que determinarían una menor incorporación de los sectores que viven en condiciones de vulnerabilidad y/o bien, d) un fuerte desfase entre el discurso de los estudiantes, representantes de un nivel etario de relevo, y el de los ejecutores de las políticas, lo cual también deberá medirse mediante estudios de rango etario/generacional en toda la región.<hr/>Abstract The existence of cultural diversity in Latin America is an incontrovertible fact; however, its levels of recognition, acceptance, and its effects on education, despite persistent warnings from international organizations about social and epistemological discrimination, have been little measured in terms of concrete public policies. The objective of this research is to measure students' attitudes toward diversity and inclusion in Higher Education (HE) institutions in five Latin American countries with significant cultural differences (Ecuador, Colombia, Mexico, Argentina, and Cuba) in relation to their specific university educational policies. A Likert attitude scale was applied to semantically ambiguous statements (not controlled by a predictably acceptable discursive framework). The sample consisted of 2,275 students, randomly selected and distributed fairly equitably by gender and country. Statistically, simple frequency comparisons between groups and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used to assess the internal consistency of the concepts. The results indicate that, contrary to what international organizations have established, the study reveals a consistently positive attitude toward both diversity and inclusion. Students are shown to be a key factor in building inclusive environments, and the predictive power of this relationship is considerable. The results also indicate that socio-demographic variables showed remarkably weak correlations with the perception of inclusion. In light of the results, the discourse of international organizations regarding discriminatory cultural inertia in this area is reflected upon, and the following is presumed: a) a lack of sufficient sources to rethink and update the true levels of discrimination and its symbolic inertia, b) the existence of a strong gap between attitudinal discourse and the reality of policies, which would require studies of “policy translation”, c) aspects unrelated to the inclusive attitude of the receiving and normative society, which would determine a lower incorporation of sectors living in vulnerable conditions and/or, d) a strong gap between the discourse of students, representatives of a changing age level, and that of policy implementers, which should also be measured through age/generational studies throughout the region. <![CDATA[Race, intersectionality and substance use patterns in a community mental health service]]> http://hml-ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1315-00062026000300102&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es Resumo O objetivo desta pesquisa é analisar a associação entre raça/cor, padrões de uso de substâncias psicoativas e indicadores de internação entre usuários de um serviço comunitário de saúde mental especializado em álcool e outras drogas, a partir de uma perspectiva interseccional no contexto do cuidado psicossocial. Trata-se de um estudo quantitativo, descritivo e transversal, baseado na análise de prontuários de usuários atendidos em um Centro de Atenção Psicossocial para Álcool e Drogas (CAPS-ad) da região Sudeste do Brasil. Foram incluídos usuários com pelo menos uma consulta registrada entre janeiro e dezembro de 2024, totalizando 92 indivíduos, dos quais 87 possuíam informações válidas sobre raça/cor. Foram analisadas variáveis ​​sociodemográficas, padrões de uso de substâncias e indicadores de internação, incluindo número de internações, reinternações e tempo de internação. Os dados foram analisados ​​por meio de estatística descritiva e interpretados sob uma perspectiva interseccional. Os resultados indicam que, entre os 87 usuários com informações sobre raça/cor, 66,7% eram negros ou pardos. O uso de múltiplas substâncias foi mais frequente entre os negros (60,0%). Entre as hospitalizações registradas, o crack foi mais frequentemente associado ao uso de múltiplas substâncias, especialmente entre indivíduos negros (87,8%). Os resultados sugerem que raça/cor é um marcador relevante para as diferenças observadas nos padrões de uso de substâncias e nos indicadores de hospitalização, destacando a necessidade de estratégias de cuidado psicossocial culturalmente sensíveis, antirracistas e equitativas.<hr/>Abstract The aim of this research is to analyze the association between race/color, patterns of psychoactive substance use, and hospitalization indicators among users of a community mental health service specializing in alcohol and other drugs, from an intersectional perspective within the context of psychosocial care. This is a quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional study based on the analysis of medical records of users treated at a Psychosocial Care Center for Alcohol and Drugs (CAPS-ad) in the southeastern region of Brazil. Users with at least one recorded consultation between January and December 2024 were included, totaling 92 individuals, of whom 87 had valid information on race/color. Sociodemographic variables, patterns of substance use, and hospitalization indicators were analyzed, including the number of hospitalizations, readmissions, and length of hospital stay. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and interpreted from an intersectional perspective. The results indicate that among the 87 users with race/color information, 66.7% were Black or mixed race. Polysubstance use was more frequent among Black individuals (60.0%). Among the hospitalizations recorded, crack cocaine was more frequently associated with polysubstance use, especially among Black individuals (87.8%). The findings suggest that race/color is a relevant marker for the observed differences in substance use patterns and hospitalization indicators, highlighting the need for culturally sensitive, anti-racist, and equitable psychosocial care strategies. <![CDATA[El hombre es lobo del hombre: invocando a Hobbes]]> http://hml-ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1315-00062026000300116&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es Resumo O objetivo desta pesquisa é analisar a associação entre raça/cor, padrões de uso de substâncias psicoativas e indicadores de internação entre usuários de um serviço comunitário de saúde mental especializado em álcool e outras drogas, a partir de uma perspectiva interseccional no contexto do cuidado psicossocial. Trata-se de um estudo quantitativo, descritivo e transversal, baseado na análise de prontuários de usuários atendidos em um Centro de Atenção Psicossocial para Álcool e Drogas (CAPS-ad) da região Sudeste do Brasil. Foram incluídos usuários com pelo menos uma consulta registrada entre janeiro e dezembro de 2024, totalizando 92 indivíduos, dos quais 87 possuíam informações válidas sobre raça/cor. Foram analisadas variáveis ​​sociodemográficas, padrões de uso de substâncias e indicadores de internação, incluindo número de internações, reinternações e tempo de internação. Os dados foram analisados ​​por meio de estatística descritiva e interpretados sob uma perspectiva interseccional. Os resultados indicam que, entre os 87 usuários com informações sobre raça/cor, 66,7% eram negros ou pardos. O uso de múltiplas substâncias foi mais frequente entre os negros (60,0%). Entre as hospitalizações registradas, o crack foi mais frequentemente associado ao uso de múltiplas substâncias, especialmente entre indivíduos negros (87,8%). Os resultados sugerem que raça/cor é um marcador relevante para as diferenças observadas nos padrões de uso de substâncias e nos indicadores de hospitalização, destacando a necessidade de estratégias de cuidado psicossocial culturalmente sensíveis, antirracistas e equitativas.<hr/>Abstract The aim of this research is to analyze the association between race/color, patterns of psychoactive substance use, and hospitalization indicators among users of a community mental health service specializing in alcohol and other drugs, from an intersectional perspective within the context of psychosocial care. This is a quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional study based on the analysis of medical records of users treated at a Psychosocial Care Center for Alcohol and Drugs (CAPS-ad) in the southeastern region of Brazil. Users with at least one recorded consultation between January and December 2024 were included, totaling 92 individuals, of whom 87 had valid information on race/color. Sociodemographic variables, patterns of substance use, and hospitalization indicators were analyzed, including the number of hospitalizations, readmissions, and length of hospital stay. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and interpreted from an intersectional perspective. The results indicate that among the 87 users with race/color information, 66.7% were Black or mixed race. Polysubstance use was more frequent among Black individuals (60.0%). Among the hospitalizations recorded, crack cocaine was more frequently associated with polysubstance use, especially among Black individuals (87.8%). The findings suggest that race/color is a relevant marker for the observed differences in substance use patterns and hospitalization indicators, highlighting the need for culturally sensitive, anti-racist, and equitable psychosocial care strategies.